|
|
| Communities in Focus:
Rochester, New York |
 |
 |
| In times of crisis, social service agencies
can help poor individuals and families meet basic needs for
food, shelter and clothing. In this section, we highlight
one such initiative, The Emergency Services and Family Stabilization
Network (known locally as The Network) in Rochester, New York.
A consortium of local social service providers developed this
innovative network to ensure the effective use of emergency
resources and to move beyond crisis intervention to promote
greater economic independence among clients.
Poverty
- In 2005, 30 percent of the population in Rochester had
incomes below the poverty threshold. This rate is substantially
higher than that of the county (12.6 percent) and state
(13.8 percent).
- The maps below detail the concentration of poverty by
Census tract in Monroe County (Figure 1) and Rochester (Figure
2) in 2000.1
- The 2005 median household income in Rochester was $26,650,
substantially lower than the county median of $45,748 and
the state median of $49,480.
- In 2005, the city’s unemployment rate was 9.3 percent,
compared with 5.8 percent for the county and 7 percent for
the state.
- Food stamp assistance cases in Monroe County increased
from 26,200 in 1999 to 37,325 in 2005.2
The Emergency Services and Family Stabilization Network:
A Social Services Initiative
- The Network was established in 1997 to provide emergency
services and to help clients avoid future crises by encouraging
greater economic independence. The Network membership represents
communities throughout Rochester and includes The Salvation
Army, Baden Street Settlement, Catholic Family Center, Charles
Settlement House, Community Place of Greater Rochester,
Ibero American Action League, SWAN (South West Area Neighborhood)
and Monroe County Legal Assistance Corporation. Member organizations
receive funding from the United Way of Greater Rochester
and support from Foodlink, the regional food bank.
- In October 2005, a survey of 1087 clients found that 80
percent presented with an immediate need for food. The main
contributing factors to client emergencies, as reported
by the clients themselves, were job loss (21 percent) and
benefit loss (38 percent).3
- In order to better regulate the provision of services,
member organizations have established uniform procedures
for addressing and documenting each client’s immediate
need for food, clothing or shelter.
- Case workers meet with clients to identify an "action
plan" for economic independence that includes access
to all programs offered by Network members. This leverages
network resources by providing each client with access to
a greater spectrum of programs than any one member organization
has the capacity to provide.
- In 2005, 23,265 households were served by The Network.
Nearly three quarters of all households receiving basic
provisions also engaged in the action plan process to identify
steps that could prevent future financial crises. Of these,
57 percent improved their status by entering job training,
becoming employed, gaining improved employment, finding
subsidized housing or obtaining health insurance.4
|
 |
 |
 |
| Figure 1
Percentage of Monroe County Population in
Poverty by Census Tract, 2000

Source: Census 2000, U.S. Census
Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics
Administration. |
 |
 |
 |
Figure 2
Percentage of Rochester Population in Poverty
by Census Tract, 2000

Source: Census 2000,
U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics
and Statistics Administration.
|
 |
 |
 |
| Contact: Alexandra Forter Sirota at (212) 720-5351 or alexandra.forter@ny.frb.org
|
 |
Endnotes
_________________________ 1The
maps are based on Census 2000 data, the latest poverty data
available at the Census tract level.
2New York
State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance. 1999 and
2005 Caseload Statistics. Accessed at
http://www.otda.state.ny.us/bdma/default.htm
3Emergency Services
and Family Stabilization Network. Client Survey, October 2005.
4Emergency Services
and Family Stabilization Network. Community Impact Performance
Report to United Way of Greater Rochester, March 2005.
January 2006
|
| |
|
|
|